|
|
|
|
|
PHASE I (Round 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOME 1: A PA management effectiveness tool is integrated into decision making |
|
|
Specific actions |
Description |
Progress snapshot |
Steps taken this quarter (if any) |
|
|
Activity 1.1 |
Establish partnership between NBSC and WWF and plan METT evaluation |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 1.2 |
Organize series of trainings for PA managers and modify METT |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 1.3 |
Create central database to contain METT scores and train staff on its use |
3 = significant progress, nearly complete |
Report on METT database progamme (annex 1). |
|
|
Activity 1.4 |
Conduct METT assessment |
4 = activity completed |
Report on METT guideline (annex 2). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obstacles faced in implementing Activity 1: |
Some training on database use need to be conducted |
|
|
Lessons learned in implementing Activity 1: |
Maintaning database on PAs management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOME 2: Establish capacity development programme |
|
|
Specific actions |
Description |
Progress snapshot |
Steps taken this quarter (if any) |
|
|
Activity 2.1 |
Conduct assessment of training needs and develop training curriculum |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.2 |
Identify trainers |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.3 |
Have trainers discuss implications and aspects of the Law on Protected Areas |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.4 |
Develop training plan and survey questionnaire |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.5 |
Identify potential stakeholdersand logistics |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.6 |
Hold trainings and evaluate results |
1 = just started, limited progress |
First training on PAs regislation in Cambodia and procedure on PAs management will be conduct in December 2009 |
|
|
Activity 2.7 |
Identify feasibility of similar trainings and develop plan for further capacity building |
2 = activity fully underway |
Report on Manual Strengthening Staff Capacity on Law Excution in Protected Areas Management (annex 3). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obstacles faced in implementing Activity 2: |
Several issues for training assessment are need to cover. However due to project has limited fund, therefore the training focus only some significant issues to delivery. |
|
|
Lessons learned in implementing Activity 2: |
Strengthen capacity PAs management on training on Law enforcemence, criminal precedure, effectiveness tool management. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOME 3: Develop legislation for PA governance |
|
|
Specific actions |
Description |
Progress snapshot |
Steps taken this quarter (if any) |
|
|
Activity 3.1 |
Conduct analysis of range of governance types and identify potential types |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 3.2 |
Select 2-3 PAs and assess most promising governance types |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 3.3 |
Draft regulation on new community-managed governance type |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 3.4 |
Organize workshops to present draft legal framework |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 3.5 |
Consult and revise draft legal framework |
3 = significant progress, nearly complete |
Conduct second ABS consultation workshop in October 2009 |
|
|
Activity 3.6 |
Submit the final draft legal framework to Council of Ministers |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
Will organise meeting with NBSC on ABS before submit to Council of Minister |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obstacles faced in implementing Activity 3: |
There are unclear resposibility of several institutions invole |
|
|
Lessons learned in implementing Activity 3: |
Strengthen coopreration with stakeholders |
|
|
|
