|
|
|
|
|
PHASE I (Round 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOME 1: Improve representativeness and governance diversity of PA network |
|
|
Specific actions |
Description |
Progress snapshot |
Steps taken this quarter (if any) |
|
|
Activity 1.1 |
Collect ecological data |
|
The colect of data on the sites allows to evaluate the work of the consultant (data processing, returned) |
|
|
Activity 1.1a |
Collect data on east humid zones to identify most urgent priorities |
2 = activity fully underway |
data processing of the site of Boughari/ Metrewgha, El Aguer, Mare de Mahmouda |
|
|
Activity 1.1b |
Visit field sites to identify potential PAs with cartographer |
2 = activity fully underway |
Field mission on Boughari/ Metrewgha, El Aguer, Mare de Mahmouda |
|
|
Activity 1.1c |
Produce maps of each potential PA |
2 = activity fully underway |
Map of Mal , Boughary, El Aguer, Mahmouda under development |
|
|
Activity 1.2 |
Collect socio-economic data |
|
The informations collected on the field are supplemented by informations of others stakeholders |
|
|
Activity 1.2a |
Inventory indigenous uses within East Mauritania |
2 = activity fully underway |
The main "indigenous" uses are being identified |
|
|
Activity 1.2b |
Conduct discussions with local populations and prepare management plan |
2 = activity fully underway |
authorities and representatives of civil society are aware of the goals of creating new PA. |
|
|
Activity 1.2c |
Prepare necessary legal documentation |
1 = just started, limited progress |
Analysis of existing documentation and exchanges with various actors concerned about projects of territory which relates to the identified sites. Analyzes collaboration appropriatenesses and risks of overlapping. |
|
|
Activity 1.2d |
Raise awareness over 6-month period |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obstacles faced in implementing Activity 1: |
The weak knowledge of the project and its objectives by the institutions and the partners accentuates the marginalisation of the DAPL and handicaps the implementation of the project. The lack of coordination of the environmental activities in Mauritania involves overlappings between the various projects. Delay in the work of the consultants. |
|
|
Lessons learned in implementing Activity 1: |
A basic work is necessary to put in perspective PoWPA in the context Mauritanian near the actors concerned. The socio-economic collect of data very limited remainder, by the lack of information, and by the partiality of the information delivered by the population. A basic work of investigation near the populations would be desirable later on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOME 2: Promote innovative PA governance types |
|
|
Specific actions |
Description |
Progress snapshot |
Steps taken this quarter (if any) |
|
|
Activity 2.1 |
Prepare terms of reference and hire consultants |
1 = just started, limited progress |
ToRs of Outcome2 are currently analyzed to evaluate the collaboration appropriatenesses with the actions of legislation modifications in progress. |
|
|
Activity 2.2 |
Set up a steering committee |
1 = just started, limited progress |
|
|
|
Activity 2.3 |
Collect materials from 2 PA directors and propose modifications to laws |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
Activity 2.4a |
Discuss results at validation workshop |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
Activity 2.4b |
Make final changes to bills and draft decrees |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
Activity 2.5 |
Finalize the proposed legislation and submit for approval |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obstacles faced in implementing Activity 2: |
Different actors currently work on the modification of environmental legislation in Mauritania. The lack of coordination between these different project and their differences in opinion are a handicap to implement Outcome 2. |
|
|
Lessons learned in implementing Activity 2: |
It is necessary to find synergy with the projects in progress to implement Outcome 2. A collaboration with the activities of the GTZ is currently in study. |
|
|
|
|
|
