|
|
|
|
|
|
PHASE I (Round 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOME 1: Assess contribution of PAs to Grenadine's economy and culture |
|
|
Specific actions |
Description |
Progress snapshot |
Steps taken this quarter (if any) |
|
|
Activity 1.1 |
Identify stakeholders |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 1.2 |
Determine ecosystems, services and valuation methods |
2 = activity fully underway |
|
|
|
Activity 1.3 |
Collect data related to use and nonuse values of goods and services |
2 = activity fully underway |
|
|
|
Activity 1.4 |
Analyze data to determine economic value of goods and services |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
Activity 1.5 |
Develop scenario for development options and their impacts on livelihoods |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
Activity 1.6 |
Disseminate results to decision makers and stakeholders |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obstacles faced in implementing Activity 1: |
The study is awaiting some of the results of the willingness to pay study so they can be considered when the EVS is being conducted |
|
|
Lessons learned in implementing Activity 1: |
The contact that is developed should contain as much detail as possible so the consultants will be clear on what it is they need to do when undertaking the study |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOME 2: Conduct willingness to pay study |
|
|
Specific actions |
Description |
Progress snapshot |
Steps taken this quarter (if any) |
|
|
Activity 2.1 |
Identify stakeholders and assemble advisory committee |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.2 |
Develop survey, methodology and type of analysis |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.3 |
Select and train surveyors |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.4 |
Collect survey data |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 2.5 |
Analyze survey results |
2 = activity fully underway |
|
|
|
Activity 2.6 |
Develop recommendations |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
Activity 2.7 |
Design and implement a marketing strategy that will lead to implementation |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
Activity 2.8 |
Disseminate results to decision makers through workshops and meetings |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obstacles faced in implementing Activity 2: |
The study was delayed because it was suggested that it be conducted in the peak of the tourist seaoson. Hence the collection of data was done during the months of January 2010 and February 2010 |
|
|
Lessons learned in implementing Activity 2: |
It would not be beneficial to conduct a survey if the group you are targeting are not available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOME 3: Integrate results of valuation study into national policy and planning |
|
|
Specific actions |
Description |
Progress snapshot |
Steps taken this quarter (if any) |
|
|
Activity 3.1 |
Develop a technical advisory committee for economic valuation project |
4 = activity completed |
|
|
|
Activity 3.2 |
Assess current integration efforts and challenges |
1 = just started, limited progress |
|
|
|
Activity 3.3 |
Review mid-term and end project progress and recommendations |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
Activity 3.4 |
Develop guidelines for integrating results into planning, budget, policy |
0 = not yet begun, no progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obstacles faced in implementing Activity 3: |
The technical group is which advises on the project is the already established National Implementation Support Partnership Committee (NISP) |
|
|
Lessons learned in implementing Activity 3: |
In order to prevent the proliferation of new committess it would be beneficial to explore the possiblity of havning an already established committee to undetake the role of TAC given that the same persons would be on these committee |
